Prompts:
Reflecting on how you would curate your social media with a critical public audience.
Identify the risks and benefits of engaging with a public audience in a media space – What are the risks for a public figure or person in a position of trust (educator, lawyer, and government official)?
Include in your blog, how to best address negative replies and reviews which reflect your personal values
To curate my social media for a critical audience, I would ensure that the information I create and post is as factually accurate as possible. It is commonly noted for those in the public eye to be very cautious of the information and kinds of posts they are sharing. When an individual is in the public eye I think that it is important that they consider the level of impact they have, especially for celebrities and even more for online influencers. For those that have gained a large social media following it can be an ego boost but there is still responsibility that comes from this. Misinformation and disinformation is easily spread online . This was especially note worthy during the pandemic when many people where looking for answers and social media platforms weren’t moderating content has intensely. The result of this was harm to many. Thus, if I had to craft a social media that had a critical public audience there are some activities I would do and things I would keep in mind.
For information sharing, I would rely on reputable sources for gathering information and link sources. I also aim to engage with reputable sources online and encourage those within my PLN to do the same. I will do these activities to make sure that there is less that the audience can critic me for. Like many other researchers or academics it is common that they will engage in others with similar fields. They do this to keep up to date with current and evolving academia. They also commonly will provide resources or citations when talking about certain topics. I think that this is similar to the way I would like to interact with my PLN. Additionally, I think that engaging in this way on social media will allow me to interact with others that operate in the same fashion. Thus, leading to a more connected and reputable impression of both myself and my peers.
I aim to provide factual information and share my knowledge with those in my PLN. I would also consider a private account. Although having a more private PLN would limit the amount of individuals I could reach, it would help me to only reach those within my community. This would allow me to limit the amount of individuals that can view or interact with me through social media. It is important to understand that when you are putting yourself on social media that some things forever remain on social media so it is important that you stand behind everything that you post.
There are both benefits and risks of engaging with a public audience in a media space while being a trusted member of the public. The benefits of doing so to engage with others and expand your view point, influence opinions, share your own thoughts. Through social media we can engage with others and listen to their differing opinions. Of course there are some exceptions such as hate speech but overall the internet is a great space to communicate with others about topics. When new information is shared, an individual may change their viewpoint and expand upon their existing one. This allows for a more diverse PLN and benefits everyone within it. As a member of a PLN you can also share your opinions and converse with others. This allows you to gain more insight into topics and enrich your understanding.
While the risks of engaging with a public audience in a media space is privacy concerns, the constant threat of public scrutiny, and threats. For those online, privacy is a big concern. Due to the many instances of data mining, your information can be used and sold and could be used for nefarious reasons. Once an individual has your information, they may choose to leak it which puts your safety at risk. As a public figure, many individuals may inflate the public figures image and if the public figure makes a mistake then they could become the target of harassment. Often times there are tirades against celebrities and the perceived wrongs that they have either said or committed. Finally, if that isn’t enough threats against one’s safety is also a major concern. Many individuals online will threaten public figures with no remorse because they think the internet is anonymous. Threats can be said against one’s life or even loved ones. This is a serious concern for those who on a public figure.
In order to manage negative replies and reviews I would need to determine the cause and if the negativity is warranted. If the negativity is unfounded then I would remove the comments or mute/ block individuals. Social media should be moderated and controlled in order to not spread disinformation and reduce misinformation. Hate speech is another example of the type of speech that shouldn’t be tolerated. While to manage the warranted negative replies and reviews, I would aim to respond to the individuals through a post directly. This allows me to create dialogue and not allow the negativity to create a larger effect on my PLN. For warranted negativity, I would aim to correct if necessary to ensure that the reputation I created wouldn’t be tarnished. As a public figure there are many things that they must consider when posting and engaging with others online.

Recent Comments